Skip to content
helloAISearch
How it worksFree toolsComparePricingLearnSign inStart free trial
How it worksFree toolsComparePricingLearnGlossaryAboutSign in
  1. Home/
  2. Guides/
  3. How-to

How-to · AI share of voice

How do you measure share of voice across ChatGPT and Perplexity?

To measure share of voice across ChatGPT and Perplexity, run the same set of customer questions on both engines on a fixed schedule, count how many answers name your brand and how many name each competitor you track, and divide your mentions by the total mentions of all tracked brands. Calculate it per engine first, because ChatGPT and Perplexity answer the same question differently and Perplexity cites its sources, then per prompt, then over time. helloAISearch does this automatically across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and charts share of voice per engine and per prompt after every scan.

Track your AI mentions free →See pricing

Free 3-day trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime

Competitor named → taskdemo · sample data
CL

“For small agencies, Competitor B is the usual pick, with Competitor A for larger teams.”

Claude · best agency software · you were not named

↓ gap detected

Task: publish “Your Brand vs Competitor B”

From today's scan · Claude · ~1 hour · re-scan Monday

Illustrative demo using sample data, not a real account or a live AI response.

What the tool has to do

A share-of-voice number only means something if the tracking behind it meets these criteria. Whether you count by hand or use a tool, check them first.

  1. 1

    It queries the engines directly, on a schedule.

    Not web-listening for your name on other sites. The tool should send your customers' questions to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity itself and record what came back.

  2. 2

    It shows the actual answer, not a score.

    You need the sentence where you were named, or the sentence where a competitor was named instead. A visibility index without the text underneath is not actionable.

  3. 3

    It measures share of voice against named competitors.

    How often each engine names you versus each competitor, per prompt, over time. This is the number that tells you whether anything you changed worked.

  4. 4

    It tells you what to do next.

    The gap between "you were not named" and "here is the page to write" is where most tools stop. Look for a recommendation tied to a specific prompt.

  5. 5

    A solo operator can afford it and read it daily.

    Entry pricing under $60 a month, no seat minimums, and a feed you can get through with coffee rather than a dashboard you open quarterly.

1Scan

Your prompts go to the engines on a schedule.

→
2Gap

A competitor was named. You were not.

→
3Move

One specific page to write today.

→
4Re-scan

Share of voice moves. Or it doesn't.

The tools, including the one the engines leave out

We run helloAISearch on ourselves. Between July 17, 2026 and August 31, 2026 it recorded 350 answers from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini across 7 category prompts; this prompt joined the tracked set on October 13, 2026, and helloAISearch has not yet been named in its answers. The “named” column is how many of those answers named each tool. Competitor descriptions are how the engines characterised them; we have not added claims of our own.

Tool
As described in AI answers
Named

helloAISearch

helloaisearch.com

Watches ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for mentions of your brand, shows the actual answer text, measures share of voice against the competitors you choose, and recommends one specific move after every scan. Lite is $29/month for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini; Studio at $59/month adds Perplexity for all four. Free 3-day trial. Start the free trial →
Named: 0our own score

Otterly AI

otterly.ai

Described as a lighter-weight AI search monitor, often recommended to small teams and agencies for simple setup.
Named: 119

Peec AI

peec.ai

Described as purpose-built for tracking brand visibility inside ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and other LLMs, with prompt-level monitoring.
Named: 86

Profound

tryprofound.com

Described by the engines as a dedicated platform for tracking how brands appear in AI-generated answers, often recommended first for teams that treat AI visibility as a core service.
Named: 123

Rankscale

rankscale.ai

Described as a tool for tracking how brands rank in AI answers and recommendation-style results, with content-gap findings.
Named: 33

Zero is our own number and we are publishing it. This page is step one of fixing it. If you want to see yours, type your website and the trial runs the same check on your brand.

See what the engines say about your brand.

Ten of your prompts on ChatGPT and Gemini, twice, with the actual answers and your brand highlighted.

Get today's Move →See how a scan works

Step by step

  1. 1

    Fix the prompt set.

    Write 10 to 20 questions your buyers ask, in their words: "best [category] for [audience]", "alternatives to [competitor]", "how do I [job your product does]". Keep the set stable; changing prompts mid-stream breaks the trend.

  2. 2

    Fix the competitor set.

    Name the 3 to 7 brands you actually lose deals to. Share of voice is always relative to a list, so the list has to stay the same between runs.

  3. 3

    Run every prompt on every engine, on a schedule.

    Answers vary between runs, so one pass is a sample, not a measurement. Weekly is the minimum; daily for the prompts closest to a purchase. Run ChatGPT and Perplexity separately, never blended.

  4. 4

    Count mentions, not positions.

    For each answer, record every tracked brand that was named. Your share of voice is your mentions divided by the total mentions of all tracked brands, for that engine over that period. Positions and sentiment are useful context, but the count is the number that trends.

  5. 5

    Record Perplexity's citations alongside it.

    Perplexity shows the sources behind each answer. The domains it cites when a competitor is named are the pages you need to be on, or to out-write. ChatGPT cites less often, so its share of voice rests more on the answer text.

  6. 6

    Read it per engine, per prompt, over time.

    A 20% share on ChatGPT and 0% on Perplexity is two different problems. Sort prompts by the gap between you and the leading competitor, write one page for the biggest gap, and re-run it after the next scan.

▾ Share of Voice · 30 dayssample data

4.1% → 7.2% in 28 days

  • Competitor A31%
  • Competitor B18%
  • Your Brand7.2%
  • Competitor C4%
Step 4, as the product shows it: share of voice per competitor over 30 days. Sample data.
⚡ Today's Movesample data

Write a comparison page for “alternatives to Competitor A”

This prompt came up 4× this week and Competitor A took every mention. A direct comparison page closes a 9-point Share of Voice gap. About an hour.

Get a briefDifficulty: 1 hour · Engine: ChatGPT
Step 5, as the product shows it: the miss becomes one page to write. Sample data.

Questions people ask next

What is a good share of voice in AI search?+

It depends on how many brands you track and how crowded the category is. With five tracked brands, an even split is 20% each; consistently above that on your core prompts means the engines treat you as a default answer. The trend matters more than the level: a rising share after you publish a page is the sign it worked.

Why is my share of voice different on ChatGPT and Perplexity?+

They retrieve differently. Perplexity searches the web for every answer and cites what it found, so it rewards pages that rank and match the question. ChatGPT leans more on what the model already knows and browses less often. The same brand can lead on one and be absent on the other.

How many times should I run each prompt?+

At least once a week per engine, and judge the trend over three or more weeks rather than any single run. helloAISearch scans every prompt weekly on Lite and Studio, adds ten daily prompts on Studio, and scans everything daily on Pro and Agency.

Can I measure AI share of voice in a spreadsheet?+

Yes, for a handful of prompts: one row per answer, one column per tracked brand, a 1 when it was named. It becomes unmanageable around 10 prompts across 4 engines on a weekly schedule, which is 160 answers a month. helloAISearch's free 3-day trial runs 10 prompts on ChatGPT and Gemini twice and computes share of voice for you.

Related guides

  • How do you track brand mentions in ChatGPT?
  • What is the best AEO tool for SaaS startups?
  • What are the best AI visibility tools for small agencies?
  • How to get cited in AI search
  • Compare helloAISearch with other tools
  • What is AEO?

Free 3-day trial · No credit card · Cancel anytime

See what the engines say about your brand.

10 of your prompts on ChatGPT and Gemini, twice, with the actual answers and your brand highlighted. Plans from $29 a month after.

Start free trial →See pricing

hello, AI search.

Free 3-day trial · No credit card · Cancel anytimeStart free trial →
helloAISearch
hello, AI search.

AI search visibility and AEO monitoring for solo operators and small agencies.
Operated by PulseSpark.ai LLC. Built in Pittsburgh, PA.

Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • AI engines
  • Compare
  • FAQ

Free tools

  • Brand AI Mention Checker
  • Share of Answer Snapshot
  • Citation Prompt Pack Generator
  • GEO / AI Readiness Score
  • Does AI Recommend Us?
  • All 33 free tools

Guides

  • Get cited in AI search
  • AI visibility tools for small agencies
  • Semrush alternatives for AI search
  • Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative
  • Track brand mentions in ChatGPT
  • Best AEO tool for SaaS startups
  • Profound alternatives
  • Measure AI share of voice

Learn

  • Articles
  • Glossary
  • What is AEO?
  • llms.txt

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Subprocessors
© 2026 PulseSpark.ai LLC. helloAISearch is operated by PulseSpark.ai LLC.
Pittsburgh, PA